<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 255 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243656</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to assess duty on Carbon-di-oxide sales to related persons, with the Commissioner confirming duty demand, interest, and penalty. The appellant argued against considering an associated company as a related person. The issue of treating gas supplied to different buyers as &quot;such goods&quot; for valuation was discussed, focusing on quality differences. The Tribunal acknowledged quality disparities but deferred a detailed assessment. The appellant was directed to make a further deposit while compliance was set for a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 255 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243656</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to assess duty on Carbon-di-oxide sales to related persons, with the Commissioner confirming duty demand, interest, and penalty. The appellant argued against considering an associated company as a related person. The issue of treating gas supplied to different buyers as &quot;such goods&quot; for valuation was discussed, focusing on quality differences. The Tribunal acknowledged quality disparities but deferred a detailed assessment. The appellant was directed to make a further deposit while compliance was set for a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>