<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 493 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161807</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged contravention under the U.P. Trade Tax import-control scheme was treated as unsustainable where the declaration form and supporting papers had been produced before seizure, and the relevant notification had extended the validity of Form XXXI. The court&#039;s reasoning was that penalty can be imposed only when the facts show an attempt to evade tax, not when the dispute rests on a technical defect or a transporter&#039;s lapse. On that basis, the procedural irregularities relied upon were held insufficient to infer collusion or tax evasion, and the penalty was set aside with consequential refund directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 493 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161807</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged contravention under the U.P. Trade Tax import-control scheme was treated as unsustainable where the declaration form and supporting papers had been produced before seizure, and the relevant notification had extended the validity of Form XXXI. The court&#039;s reasoning was that penalty can be imposed only when the facts show an attempt to evade tax, not when the dispute rests on a technical defect or a transporter&#039;s lapse. On that basis, the procedural irregularities relied upon were held insufficient to infer collusion or tax evasion, and the penalty was set aside with consequential refund directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>