<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1015 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161805</link>
    <description>Separately shown freight, insurance and handling charges were not deductible from taxable turnover under rule 6(c) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959, because the commercial arrangement showed that delivery of gas cylinders to the buyers&#039; premises and return of empty cylinders formed part of the sale. Although the invoices split the price into gas value and freight-related charges, the charges were not independent of the sale consideration and were effectively part of an inclusive price. Mere bifurcation in the invoice did not satisfy the statutory condition for deduction, so the disputed turnover remained assessable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1015 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161805</link>
      <description>Separately shown freight, insurance and handling charges were not deductible from taxable turnover under rule 6(c) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959, because the commercial arrangement showed that delivery of gas cylinders to the buyers&#039; premises and return of empty cylinders formed part of the sale. Although the invoices split the price into gas value and freight-related charges, the charges were not independent of the sale consideration and were effectively part of an inclusive price. Mere bifurcation in the invoice did not satisfy the statutory condition for deduction, so the disputed turnover remained assessable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>