<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 539 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161793</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC analysed an exemption notification under section 12-A of the Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act for silk fabrics and held that it operated from 1 April 2001, the start of the relevant assessment year. Because the Act defined &quot;year&quot; from 1 April and linked turnover of stock of luxuries to that period, the date of issue of the notification did not limit the exemption&#039;s commencement. The monthly statement requirement under section 5-A was treated as a procedural provision and could not curtail the substantive exemption granted under section 12-A. Tax was therefore not exigible for the period from 1 April 2001 to 24 August 2001.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 539 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161793</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC analysed an exemption notification under section 12-A of the Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act for silk fabrics and held that it operated from 1 April 2001, the start of the relevant assessment year. Because the Act defined &quot;year&quot; from 1 April and linked turnover of stock of luxuries to that period, the date of issue of the notification did not limit the exemption&#039;s commencement. The monthly statement requirement under section 5-A was treated as a procedural provision and could not curtail the substantive exemption granted under section 12-A. Tax was therefore not exigible for the period from 1 April 2001 to 24 August 2001.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>