<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 680 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161766</link>
    <description>Unserviceable steel rails sold as scrap for re-rolling were held to fall within entry 2-A of the Third Schedule as &quot;iron and steel scrap&quot;, because scrap bears its ordinary meaning of waste material no longer serving its original purpose. Item (xvi) of entry 2 was confined to defectives, rejects, cuttings and end pieces arising from the specified manufactured items and did not extend to discarded rails sold as scrap. The Government Order on set-off did not affect the statutory classification. The assessee was therefore liable as the last purchaser, and restoration of the assessment was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:35:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 680 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161766</link>
      <description>Unserviceable steel rails sold as scrap for re-rolling were held to fall within entry 2-A of the Third Schedule as &quot;iron and steel scrap&quot;, because scrap bears its ordinary meaning of waste material no longer serving its original purpose. Item (xvi) of entry 2 was confined to defectives, rejects, cuttings and end pieces arising from the specified manufactured items and did not extend to discarded rails sold as scrap. The Government Order on set-off did not affect the statutory classification. The assessee was therefore liable as the last purchaser, and restoration of the assessment was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>