<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>OEMs Not Job Workers u/r 10A: Classification Inconsistent With Legal Principles Despite Higher Buyer Sale Price.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17146</link>
    <description>Valuation - Whether OEM are Job Workers - Trying to bring such type of transactions under provisions of Rule 10A of Valuation Rules, is not in consonance with the settled law, even if the finished products are sold at higher price by the buyer - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:07:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>OEMs Not Job Workers u/r 10A: Classification Inconsistent With Legal Principles Despite Higher Buyer Sale Price.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17146</link>
      <description>Valuation - Whether OEM are Job Workers - Trying to bring such type of transactions under provisions of Rule 10A of Valuation Rules, is not in consonance with the settled law, even if the finished products are sold at higher price by the buyer - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:07:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>