<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 239 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243640</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai addressed issues concerning unexplained investment in shares and profit on the sale of shares for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT remitted the matters back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, noting that all arguments were not fully considered. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 239 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243640</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai addressed issues concerning unexplained investment in shares and profit on the sale of shares for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT remitted the matters back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, noting that all arguments were not fully considered. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>