<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 222 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on deleting the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act and disallowing excess depreciation on dumpers. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of contracts, no outstanding payments, and consistency with previous judicial and Tribunal rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 222 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on deleting the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act and disallowing excess depreciation on dumpers. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of contracts, no outstanding payments, and consistency with previous judicial and Tribunal rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>