<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 216 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243617</link>
    <description>Delay in filing appeal was not condoned due to unsatisfactory reasons provided by the department. Stay application was denied as no valid reasons were presented. The issue of unjust enrichment in a refund case was analyzed, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the respondents due to the correct application of unjust enrichment principles by the original authority. The department&#039;s failure to establish a case for delay condonation, stay order, or on merit resulted in the dismissal of the appeal and related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 216 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243617</link>
      <description>Delay in filing appeal was not condoned due to unsatisfactory reasons provided by the department. Stay application was denied as no valid reasons were presented. The issue of unjust enrichment in a refund case was analyzed, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the respondents due to the correct application of unjust enrichment principles by the original authority. The department&#039;s failure to establish a case for delay condonation, stay order, or on merit resulted in the dismissal of the appeal and related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>