<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 208 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order demanding recovery of Cenvat Credit, citing the inapplicability of Rule 3(5C) in this case and the legal precedent that insurance compensation does not affect the validity of Cenvat Credit claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 208 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order demanding recovery of Cenvat Credit, citing the inapplicability of Rule 3(5C) in this case and the legal precedent that insurance compensation does not affect the validity of Cenvat Credit claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>