<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 837 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161749</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the JCCT&#039;s order and directing a reconsideration of the refund claim in accordance with earlier bench directions. The JCCT was instructed to verify sales tax payments, ensuring TISCO and SAIL paid the amounts to the state government. A reasoned order for sales tax refund on raw materials from April 5, 1996, to March 31, 1998, was to be passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 837 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161749</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the JCCT&#039;s order and directing a reconsideration of the refund claim in accordance with earlier bench directions. The JCCT was instructed to verify sales tax payments, ensuring TISCO and SAIL paid the amounts to the state government. A reasoned order for sales tax refund on raw materials from April 5, 1996, to March 31, 1998, was to be passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>