<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 199 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty amounting to Rs.6,68,448/- imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The applicants, engaged in the manufacture of sponge iron, were found to have used iron ore and coal in their manufacturing process, justifying the cenvat credit availed on service tax paid. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument to reverse the cenvat credit on iron ore fines sold in the market, citing legal precedents that supported the applicants&#039; position. As a result, the Tribunal waived all dues adjudged and stayed the recovery during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 199 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty amounting to Rs.6,68,448/- imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The applicants, engaged in the manufacture of sponge iron, were found to have used iron ore and coal in their manufacturing process, justifying the cenvat credit availed on service tax paid. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument to reverse the cenvat credit on iron ore fines sold in the market, citing legal precedents that supported the applicants&#039; position. As a result, the Tribunal waived all dues adjudged and stayed the recovery during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>