<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 191 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, finding the AO&#039;s treatment of interest subsidy under the cash system as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal clarified that the CIT had rightly exercised jurisdiction under section 263, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 191 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, finding the AO&#039;s treatment of interest subsidy under the cash system as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal clarified that the CIT had rightly exercised jurisdiction under section 263, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>