<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 188 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243588</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessing officer&#039;s reduction of export turnover by deducting foreign commission under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act was not lawful. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the inclusion of the commission in the export turnover for Section 80HHC benefits was deemed correct. The judgment clarified that the commission paid to the foreign agent should not impact the export turnover calculation for tax deductions, emphasizing the definition of export turnover under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 188 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243588</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessing officer&#039;s reduction of export turnover by deducting foreign commission under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act was not lawful. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the inclusion of the commission in the export turnover for Section 80HHC benefits was deemed correct. The judgment clarified that the commission paid to the foreign agent should not impact the export turnover calculation for tax deductions, emphasizing the definition of export turnover under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>