<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 172 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in setting aside the assessment order under Section 263 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had properly considered the set-off of brought forward losses against income and that the CIT&#039;s intervention was unwarranted. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and restoring the assessment order passed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 06:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 172 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in setting aside the assessment order under Section 263 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had properly considered the set-off of brought forward losses against income and that the CIT&#039;s intervention was unwarranted. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and restoring the assessment order passed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>