<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 167 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the Appeal regarding the interest rate on the refund of pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellant&#039;s request for a higher interest rate of 12% instead of the granted 6% was denied, as they failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim. The Tribunal found no justification to overturn the decisions of the lower authorities based on the lack of contradictory evidence presented by the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 06:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 167 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the Appeal regarding the interest rate on the refund of pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellant&#039;s request for a higher interest rate of 12% instead of the granted 6% was denied, as they failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim. The Tribunal found no justification to overturn the decisions of the lower authorities based on the lack of contradictory evidence presented by the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>