<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243564</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in a split decision regarding the duty payment during the default period, with one member accepting the payment through Cenvat credit and the other requiring cash payment due to the appellant&#039;s fraudulent actions. The appellant was directed to pay interest on the late duty deposit, a penalty for violating Central Excise Rules, and a pre-deposit amount of Rs. 25 lakh for the appeal hearing. The tribunal emphasized the mandatory compliance with Rule 8 for duty payments and the consequences of fraudulent conduct, ultimately leaving the resolution to be determined based on legal precedents and case specifics.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243564</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in a split decision regarding the duty payment during the default period, with one member accepting the payment through Cenvat credit and the other requiring cash payment due to the appellant&#039;s fraudulent actions. The appellant was directed to pay interest on the late duty deposit, a penalty for violating Central Excise Rules, and a pre-deposit amount of Rs. 25 lakh for the appeal hearing. The tribunal emphasized the mandatory compliance with Rule 8 for duty payments and the consequences of fraudulent conduct, ultimately leaving the resolution to be determined based on legal precedents and case specifics.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>