<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 158 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of CENVAT credit based on supplementary invoices for differential duty paid on lubricating oil between two units. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority due to ongoing related proceedings involving another unit, impacting the appellant&#039;s credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 06:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 158 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of CENVAT credit based on supplementary invoices for differential duty paid on lubricating oil between two units. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority due to ongoing related proceedings involving another unit, impacting the appellant&#039;s credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>