<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 155 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243555</link>
    <description>The Revision Application challenging the Order-in-Appeal favoring the respondent was rejected as time-barred by the Central Government. The delay in filing exceeded the condonable period specified under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944, leading to the application being deemed ineligible for consideration. Legal precedents emphasized the strict adherence to prescribed time limits for filing claims, with no discretion available for extensions beyond the statutory period. The decision underscored the necessity of complying with statutory timelines in legal proceedings, resulting in the dismissal of the Revision Application solely on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 06:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 155 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243555</link>
      <description>The Revision Application challenging the Order-in-Appeal favoring the respondent was rejected as time-barred by the Central Government. The delay in filing exceeded the condonable period specified under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944, leading to the application being deemed ineligible for consideration. Legal precedents emphasized the strict adherence to prescribed time limits for filing claims, with no discretion available for extensions beyond the statutory period. The decision underscored the necessity of complying with statutory timelines in legal proceedings, resulting in the dismissal of the Revision Application solely on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>