<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 719 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161725</link>
    <description>Non-ferrous metal scrap intended to be melted and reused in manufacture falls within entry 29-A of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Entry Tax Act, as the expression &quot;non-ferrous metal&quot; was construed in its commercial and contextual sense and scrap was treated as raw material rather than a finished product. The article also notes that a mistaken return or voluntary payment does not bar an assessee from challenging taxability in appeal, because the appellate authority must examine the true exigibility of the goods. On that reasoning, the revisional order was unsustainable, the appellate order was restored, and the scrap turnover remained exempt from entry tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 719 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161725</link>
      <description>Non-ferrous metal scrap intended to be melted and reused in manufacture falls within entry 29-A of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Entry Tax Act, as the expression &quot;non-ferrous metal&quot; was construed in its commercial and contextual sense and scrap was treated as raw material rather than a finished product. The article also notes that a mistaken return or voluntary payment does not bar an assessee from challenging taxability in appeal, because the appellate authority must examine the true exigibility of the goods. On that reasoning, the revisional order was unsustainable, the appellate order was restored, and the scrap turnover remained exempt from entry tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>