<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161724</link>
    <description>Under section 28-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, a dealer seeking clarification is entitled to a personal hearing before an adverse clarification is issued when such hearing is requested, because the clarification can bind the assessing authority and materially affect assessment rights. The Court also stated that a beneficial clarification binds the revenue authorities in proceedings under the Act, while an adverse clarification, though binding on the assessing authority, remains open to challenge by the assessee in appeal. The impugned clarification was set aside for breach of fairness and remitted for reconsideration after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161724</link>
      <description>Under section 28-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, a dealer seeking clarification is entitled to a personal hearing before an adverse clarification is issued when such hearing is requested, because the clarification can bind the assessing authority and materially affect assessment rights. The Court also stated that a beneficial clarification binds the revenue authorities in proceedings under the Act, while an adverse clarification, though binding on the assessing authority, remains open to challenge by the assessee in appeal. The impugned clarification was set aside for breach of fairness and remitted for reconsideration after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>