https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161714 The court dismissed the challenge to the order granting instalments under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. It was found that the demand notice issued after the registration of the case before BIFR was valid as the case was not registered at the time of the Commissioner's order. The petitioner was advised to file objections and approach the concerned authority properly. The court emphasized the importance of following the correct procedure for filing objections and granted liberty to the petitioner to do so, with no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:10:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161714 The court dismissed the challenge to the order granting instalments under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. It was found that the demand notice issued after the registration of the case before BIFR was valid as the case was not registered at the time of the Commissioner's order. The petitioner was advised to file objections and approach the concerned authority properly. The court emphasized the importance of following the correct procedure for filing objections and granted liberty to the petitioner to do so, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161714