<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 724 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161713</link>
    <description>Penalty for transporting imported goods without Form XXXI was held unsustainable where the transactions were fully recorded in the assessee&#039;s books, supported by customs records, tax had been paid with interest, and no intention to evade tax or cause revenue loss was found. The court treated the lapse as only technical or venial and reiterated that a penalty for breach of a statutory obligation is not automatic. In the absence of deliberate defiance, contumacy, dishonesty, or conscious disregard of the obligation, the penalty could not be maintained and was liable to be cancelled in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:06:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 724 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161713</link>
      <description>Penalty for transporting imported goods without Form XXXI was held unsustainable where the transactions were fully recorded in the assessee&#039;s books, supported by customs records, tax had been paid with interest, and no intention to evade tax or cause revenue loss was found. The court treated the lapse as only technical or venial and reiterated that a penalty for breach of a statutory obligation is not automatic. In the absence of deliberate defiance, contumacy, dishonesty, or conscious disregard of the obligation, the penalty could not be maintained and was liable to be cancelled in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>