<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161705</link>
    <description>Notices issued under section 29-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 were unsustainable where an amount earlier refunded had been wrongly paid out and was available for adjustment against the assessee&#039;s admitted tax liability for a later assessment year. Following its earlier decision between the same parties and the precedent relied on there, the HC held that the refundable amount, already refunded in relation to the relevant earlier assessment years, could be set off against the petitioner&#039;s liability for assessment year 1989-90. The impugned notices were therefore quashed and adjustment of the excess refund was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:31:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161705</link>
      <description>Notices issued under section 29-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 were unsustainable where an amount earlier refunded had been wrongly paid out and was available for adjustment against the assessee&#039;s admitted tax liability for a later assessment year. Following its earlier decision between the same parties and the precedent relied on there, the HC held that the refundable amount, already refunded in relation to the relevant earlier assessment years, could be set off against the petitioner&#039;s liability for assessment year 1989-90. The impugned notices were therefore quashed and adjustment of the excess refund was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>