<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 499 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161702</link>
    <description>Under single point taxation, each commercial commodity is treated as a distinct taxable unit unless the statute indicates otherwise, so items listed separately in the Third Schedule are not merged merely because they appear in the same sub-clause. The stated test is whether each item retains a separate commercial identity. On second-sale exemption, pig iron used to make ingot moulds lost its original identity when the moulds became unserviceable and were later sold as scrap, so the scrap was treated as a different commodity from the pig iron originally purchased. Accordingly, the exemption was unavailable because the goods sold later did not remain the same commodity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 499 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161702</link>
      <description>Under single point taxation, each commercial commodity is treated as a distinct taxable unit unless the statute indicates otherwise, so items listed separately in the Third Schedule are not merged merely because they appear in the same sub-clause. The stated test is whether each item retains a separate commercial identity. On second-sale exemption, pig iron used to make ingot moulds lost its original identity when the moulds became unserviceable and were later sold as scrap, so the scrap was treated as a different commodity from the pig iron originally purchased. Accordingly, the exemption was unavailable because the goods sold later did not remain the same commodity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>