<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 596 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161684</link>
    <description>A notice proposing review of an appellate sales tax order was held invalid because the deduction for sales of wires had been allowed on the settled footing that wire rods and wires were the same commodity for the relevant entry and that tax had already been borne at the purchase stage. The review attempt sought to reopen that allowance by re-characterising the goods and taxing turnover earlier exempted, but the deduction issue had not been decided in appeal and that part of the assessment had not merged in the appellate order. The proposed review also ignored binding Supreme Court authority on wire rods and wires, making it contrary to settled law and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 596 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161684</link>
      <description>A notice proposing review of an appellate sales tax order was held invalid because the deduction for sales of wires had been allowed on the settled footing that wire rods and wires were the same commodity for the relevant entry and that tax had already been borne at the purchase stage. The review attempt sought to reopen that allowance by re-characterising the goods and taxing turnover earlier exempted, but the deduction issue had not been decided in appeal and that part of the assessment had not merged in the appellate order. The proposed review also ignored binding Supreme Court authority on wire rods and wires, making it contrary to settled law and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>