<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 690 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161674</link>
    <description>A purchase of machinery from an outside supplier, followed by supply to a Kerala concern under a licence arrangement, was treated as two distinct transactions: an inter-State purchase and a separate local supply. The local supply was held exigible to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, and the arrangement justified an inference of possible tax evasion where the petitioner was unregistered and the goods were intercepted at the check-post. However, penalty could not be fixed mechanically at the maximum under section 29A; it had to be reworked to correspond to the tax sought to be evaded, after notice and verification of any prior assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 690 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161674</link>
      <description>A purchase of machinery from an outside supplier, followed by supply to a Kerala concern under a licence arrangement, was treated as two distinct transactions: an inter-State purchase and a separate local supply. The local supply was held exigible to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, and the arrangement justified an inference of possible tax evasion where the petitioner was unregistered and the goods were intercepted at the check-post. However, penalty could not be fixed mechanically at the maximum under section 29A; it had to be reworked to correspond to the tax sought to be evaded, after notice and verification of any prior assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>