<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 531 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161668</link>
    <description>A Commissioner cannot issue a circular or consequential notice taking a view contrary to a final appellate finding that a rubber roller is a rubber product. Where the Tribunal has finally determined the product classification and that determination has attained finality, subordinate authorities must follow it under judicial discipline and cannot seek a contrary modification of the recognition certificate under the Sales Tax Act. The common parlance test also supports classification of the product as a rubber product. The contrary circular and notice were therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:02:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 531 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161668</link>
      <description>A Commissioner cannot issue a circular or consequential notice taking a view contrary to a final appellate finding that a rubber roller is a rubber product. Where the Tribunal has finally determined the product classification and that determination has attained finality, subordinate authorities must follow it under judicial discipline and cannot seek a contrary modification of the recognition certificate under the Sales Tax Act. The common parlance test also supports classification of the product as a rubber product. The contrary circular and notice were therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>