<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 561 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161621</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders dated February 7, 2003, and condoned the delay in filing the revisions. The Court directed the revisionary authority to hear and decide the revisions on their merits within six months, without being influenced by the Court&#039;s observations, and after granting the petitioner adequate opportunity. This decision aimed to ensure a fair review of the case based on its merits and within a reasonable timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:07:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 561 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161621</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders dated February 7, 2003, and condoned the delay in filing the revisions. The Court directed the revisionary authority to hear and decide the revisions on their merits within six months, without being influenced by the Court&#039;s observations, and after granting the petitioner adequate opportunity. This decision aimed to ensure a fair review of the case based on its merits and within a reasonable timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>