<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Reviews Share Premium Hike u/s 68: New Company Lacks Evidence for Thousandfold Increase Over Face Value.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17099</link>
    <description>Deletion made u/s 68 - assessee in the case was incorporated barely few months before the commencement of the assessment year, and there is no material to indicate why its markup of the share premium thousand folds in respect of the shares which were of the face value of Rs. 10 lakhs was justified - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:59:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Reviews Share Premium Hike u/s 68: New Company Lacks Evidence for Thousandfold Increase Over Face Value.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17099</link>
      <description>Deletion made u/s 68 - assessee in the case was incorporated barely few months before the commencement of the assessment year, and there is no material to indicate why its markup of the share premium thousand folds in respect of the shares which were of the face value of Rs. 10 lakhs was justified - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:59:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>