<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 154 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243554</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals due to the lack of multiple members on the authorizing Committee. Shri Arvind Singh, the sole signatory holding charge of two Commissionerates, was found inadequate for authorization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 154 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243554</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed both Revenue appeals due to the lack of multiple members on the authorizing Committee. Shri Arvind Singh, the sole signatory holding charge of two Commissionerates, was found inadequate for authorization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>