https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243553 Under the amended appellate procedure, a Revenue appeal against an order of the lower authority required a prior review by a Committee of Commissioners on the legality of that order. As no such review order accompanied the appeals and they were filed only under the Commissioner's signature, the filing did not satisfy the mandatory statutory requirement. The appeals were therefore held not maintainable and dismissed, leaving the Commissioner (Appeals)' order undisturbed. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243553 Under the amended appellate procedure, a Revenue appeal against an order of the lower authority required a prior review by a Committee of Commissioners on the legality of that order. As no such review order accompanied the appeals and they were filed only under the Commissioner's signature, the filing did not satisfy the mandatory statutory requirement. The appeals were therefore held not maintainable and dismissed, leaving the Commissioner (Appeals)' order undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243553