<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 148 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s stay application, waiving the pre-deposit of tax amounting to Rs.86,38,951 for services provided to Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. The Tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s arguments regarding the categorization of services, holding that the demand under both &quot;erection, commissioning, or installation service&quot; and works contract service was not sustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant established a prima facie case for the waiver of the entire tax amount, including interest and penalty, and granted a stay of recovery in favor of the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 148 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s stay application, waiving the pre-deposit of tax amounting to Rs.86,38,951 for services provided to Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. The Tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s arguments regarding the categorization of services, holding that the demand under both &quot;erection, commissioning, or installation service&quot; and works contract service was not sustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant established a prima facie case for the waiver of the entire tax amount, including interest and penalty, and granted a stay of recovery in favor of the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>