https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243547 The appeal filed by M/s. Rudra Galaxy Channel Ltd. against the Order-in-Appeal confirming a demand of Rs.11,23,798 with reduced penalty of Rs.4,50,000 was rejected. The appellant's request for cum tax treatment and penalty waiver was denied as the penalty reduction below the minimum prescribed was deemed unsustainable in law. The absence of documentary evidence supporting the claim for cum tax treatment led to its rejection. The appellate authority upheld the penalty equal to the service tax demand confirmed, citing legal precedents. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and M/s. Rudra Galaxy Channel Ltd. was held liable for the penalty amount. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243547 The appeal filed by M/s. Rudra Galaxy Channel Ltd. against the Order-in-Appeal confirming a demand of Rs.11,23,798 with reduced penalty of Rs.4,50,000 was rejected. The appellant's request for cum tax treatment and penalty waiver was denied as the penalty reduction below the minimum prescribed was deemed unsustainable in law. The absence of documentary evidence supporting the claim for cum tax treatment led to its rejection. The appellate authority upheld the penalty equal to the service tax demand confirmed, citing legal precedents. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and M/s. Rudra Galaxy Channel Ltd. was held liable for the penalty amount. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243547