<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 145 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243545</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai granted a stay on the recovery of the disputed amount as the applicant had availed of renting immovable property services and paid service tax, even though the address was not on the registration certificate. The pre-deposit requirement was waived during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 145 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243545</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai granted a stay on the recovery of the disputed amount as the applicant had availed of renting immovable property services and paid service tax, even though the address was not on the registration certificate. The pre-deposit requirement was waived during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>