https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243543 The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit Rs.50.00 Lakhs within eight weeks to stay the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal process. The liability of Service Tax on the sub-contractor was upheld as the Applicant failed to provide evidence of payment by the principal contractor. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing proof of payment to support the claim of not being liable for the tax. The demand was found not entirely barred by limitation as the Applicant had not disclosed all relevant information. No plea of financial hardship was made, influencing the decision to require a specified deposit to stay recovery of dues. en-us Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:25:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243543 The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit Rs.50.00 Lakhs within eight weeks to stay the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal process. The liability of Service Tax on the sub-contractor was upheld as the Applicant failed to provide evidence of payment by the principal contractor. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing proof of payment to support the claim of not being liable for the tax. The demand was found not entirely barred by limitation as the Applicant had not disclosed all relevant information. No plea of financial hardship was made, influencing the decision to require a specified deposit to stay recovery of dues. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243543