https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243539 Repatriation of employees to their parent department was upheld where the transfer of service to the Trade Tax Department was only for a limited period, not permanent. The petitioners retained lien in the parent department, and their service conditions continued to be governed by that department. The orders sending them back did not terminate service or attach any stigma, and no violation of the governing rules, regulations, or government orders was shown. The repatriation was therefore not arbitrary, not based on extraneous considerations, and did not infringe Article 14. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243539 Repatriation of employees to their parent department was upheld where the transfer of service to the Trade Tax Department was only for a limited period, not permanent. The petitioners retained lien in the parent department, and their service conditions continued to be governed by that department. The orders sending them back did not terminate service or attach any stigma, and no violation of the governing rules, regulations, or government orders was shown. The repatriation was therefore not arbitrary, not based on extraneous considerations, and did not infringe Article 14. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243539