<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 124 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243523</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 5,37,909 by the assessee was incorrect. The Court found that under the mercantile system of accounting, income accrues based on entitlement, not actual receipt. Therefore, the High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 124 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243523</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 5,37,909 by the assessee was incorrect. The Court found that under the mercantile system of accounting, income accrues based on entitlement, not actual receipt. Therefore, the High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>