<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 115 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to assess duty on goods declared as seconds quality under the DEEC scheme, rejecting the appellants&#039; challenge based on higher declared value. The goods were confirmed to be seconds quality, justifying the duty assessment and penalties imposed. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the duty assessment and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 115 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to assess duty on goods declared as seconds quality under the DEEC scheme, rejecting the appellants&#039; challenge based on higher declared value. The goods were confirmed to be seconds quality, justifying the duty assessment and penalties imposed. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the duty assessment and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>