<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243506</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on additional customs duty for imported CRNGO steel sheets depends on proof that the duty-paid inputs were transferred to the new factory owner and actually used in manufacture. Where a factory is taken over, entitlement linked to inputs, work-in-progress or capital goods must be supported by proper transfer and accounting to the Commissioner&#039;s satisfaction. On the recorded facts, the imports were made by the earlier owner and the order did not determine whether the steel sheets were transferred to the appellant, consumed before takeover, or used by the appellant. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243506</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on additional customs duty for imported CRNGO steel sheets depends on proof that the duty-paid inputs were transferred to the new factory owner and actually used in manufacture. Where a factory is taken over, entitlement linked to inputs, work-in-progress or capital goods must be supported by proper transfer and accounting to the Commissioner&#039;s satisfaction. On the recorded facts, the imports were made by the earlier owner and the order did not determine whether the steel sheets were transferred to the appellant, consumed before takeover, or used by the appellant. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>