<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 107 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243505</link>
    <description>The judgment aligns with the precedent set by the High Court of Gujarat, ruling that deemed exports to 100% Export Oriented Units should be treated as physical exports for cenvat credit refund under Rule 5. The decision emphasizes consistency in legal interpretation, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the entitlement to refund for goods cleared to EOUs. It underscores the importance of upholding decisions that provide clarity on complex matters related to cenvat credit refunds for deemed exports to EOUs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:21:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 107 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243505</link>
      <description>The judgment aligns with the precedent set by the High Court of Gujarat, ruling that deemed exports to 100% Export Oriented Units should be treated as physical exports for cenvat credit refund under Rule 5. The decision emphasizes consistency in legal interpretation, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the entitlement to refund for goods cleared to EOUs. It underscores the importance of upholding decisions that provide clarity on complex matters related to cenvat credit refunds for deemed exports to EOUs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>