<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 104 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243502</link>
    <description>The Central Government allowed the revision applications filed by M/s. Shreyas Packaging, Surat, concerning rebate claims for excisable goods cleared for export. Despite discrepancies in export documents, the Government emphasized the importance of substantive export requirements over procedural lapses, noting that the core requirement for rebate is the manufacture and export of goods. As long as this fundamental requirement is met, procedural deviations can be overlooked. The Government set aside the rejection of the rebate claims, highlighting the consistency of consignee details with commercial invoices and packing lists, ultimately ruling in favor of the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:21:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 104 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243502</link>
      <description>The Central Government allowed the revision applications filed by M/s. Shreyas Packaging, Surat, concerning rebate claims for excisable goods cleared for export. Despite discrepancies in export documents, the Government emphasized the importance of substantive export requirements over procedural lapses, noting that the core requirement for rebate is the manufacture and export of goods. As long as this fundamental requirement is met, procedural deviations can be overlooked. The Government set aside the rejection of the rebate claims, highlighting the consistency of consignee details with commercial invoices and packing lists, ultimately ruling in favor of the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>