https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243494 Service tax demand arising from construction activities was challenged on the ground that the abatement benefit under Notification No. 1/2006-ST had not been properly given and that the demand was overstated, with financial hardship also pleaded. The Tribunal considered the submissions and material on record, reduced the required pre-deposit, and protected the appellant from recovery of the balance during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance with the deposit condition. Relief was therefore granted in part against the disputed tax, interest and penalty. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:28:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243494 Service tax demand arising from construction activities was challenged on the ground that the abatement benefit under Notification No. 1/2006-ST had not been properly given and that the demand was overstated, with financial hardship also pleaded. The Tribunal considered the submissions and material on record, reduced the required pre-deposit, and protected the appellant from recovery of the balance during the pendency of the appeal, subject to compliance with the deposit condition. Relief was therefore granted in part against the disputed tax, interest and penalty. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243494