https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243492 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's review application challenging the order to deposit Rs. 40 Lakh, emphasizing no jurisdictional error. The Tribunal maintained that the substantive appeal would determine if loading/unloading activities constituted taxable service. The appellant's failure to comply with the deposit condition led to the rejection of the review request. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed seeking a review based on alleged oversight of facts in the Show Cause Notice unwarranted, as no discernible jurisdictional error was found. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:28:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243492 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's review application challenging the order to deposit Rs. 40 Lakh, emphasizing no jurisdictional error. The Tribunal maintained that the substantive appeal would determine if loading/unloading activities constituted taxable service. The appellant's failure to comply with the deposit condition led to the rejection of the review request. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed seeking a review based on alleged oversight of facts in the Show Cause Notice unwarranted, as no discernible jurisdictional error was found. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243492