<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 91 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for the appellant to file an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of an interim order for pre-deposit before dismissing an appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal directed a thorough review of the issues raised by the appellant regarding discrepancies in tax payments, including recalculating tax liabilities and interest payments. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to consider the application under Section 35F and take necessary actions within a specified timeframe to ensure procedural fairness and address errors in tax calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:28:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 91 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for the appellant to file an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of an interim order for pre-deposit before dismissing an appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal directed a thorough review of the issues raised by the appellant regarding discrepancies in tax payments, including recalculating tax liabilities and interest payments. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to consider the application under Section 35F and take necessary actions within a specified timeframe to ensure procedural fairness and address errors in tax calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>