<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 85 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that the amounts for the parties in question did not qualify as income under section 41(1). Consequently, the cross objection by the assessee was dismissed, resulting in the rejection of both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection. The order was issued on August 21, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 85 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that the amounts for the parties in question did not qualify as income under section 41(1). Consequently, the cross objection by the assessee was dismissed, resulting in the rejection of both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection. The order was issued on August 21, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>