<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 74 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243472</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the payments made by the assessee for hiring vehicles did not fall under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unjustified. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no legal issue in the Tribunal&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 74 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243472</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the payments made by the assessee for hiring vehicles did not fall under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unjustified. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no legal issue in the Tribunal&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>