https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243462 The court allowed the petition for restoration of the company's name to the register of companies. It held that the petitioner had locus standi as a member and creditor. The term "just" under Section 560(6) was interpreted broadly, allowing restoration even if the company was not conducting business. The court directed the Registrar of Companies to restore the company's name, enabling the petitioner to pursue legal remedies for the loss suffered. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Oct 2018 18:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243462 The court allowed the petition for restoration of the company's name to the register of companies. It held that the petitioner had locus standi as a member and creditor. The term "just" under Section 560(6) was interpreted broadly, allowing restoration even if the company was not conducting business. The court directed the Registrar of Companies to restore the company's name, enabling the petitioner to pursue legal remedies for the loss suffered. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243462