<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1283 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161611</link>
    <description>Section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies where goods are exempt from State tax generally, but not where the exemption is confined to specified conditions or circumstances. The Rajasthan High Court distinguished conditions attached to a dealer or industrial unit from criteria used only to identify the class of goods. On that approach, the State notification dated 7 March 1994 exempting footwear not made of leather and valued up to Rs. 100 was treated as a general exemption of a class of goods, because it imposed no dealer-specific or turnover-specific condition. The inter-State turnover of such footwear was therefore exempt under section 8(2-A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 17:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1283 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161611</link>
      <description>Section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies where goods are exempt from State tax generally, but not where the exemption is confined to specified conditions or circumstances. The Rajasthan High Court distinguished conditions attached to a dealer or industrial unit from criteria used only to identify the class of goods. On that approach, the State notification dated 7 March 1994 exempting footwear not made of leather and valued up to Rs. 100 was treated as a general exemption of a class of goods, because it imposed no dealer-specific or turnover-specific condition. The inter-State turnover of such footwear was therefore exempt under section 8(2-A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>