<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 858 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161587</link>
    <description>Purchase tax under section 5A was attracted where goods such as prawns, lobsters and groundnut were bought and then consumed in preparing cooked food, because they were not sold in the same form as purchased; the levy was upheld against the assessee. Mineral water was not covered by the beverages entry for the relevant assessment years, and the later specific entry for mineral water confirmed that it fell within the residuary entry; assessment on that basis was sustained. Section 5A also applied to consumption of goods, not merely manufacture, so the turnover assessed under that provision was valid and the revision failed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 858 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161587</link>
      <description>Purchase tax under section 5A was attracted where goods such as prawns, lobsters and groundnut were bought and then consumed in preparing cooked food, because they were not sold in the same form as purchased; the levy was upheld against the assessee. Mineral water was not covered by the beverages entry for the relevant assessment years, and the later specific entry for mineral water confirmed that it fell within the residuary entry; assessment on that basis was sustained. Section 5A also applied to consumption of goods, not merely manufacture, so the turnover assessed under that provision was valid and the revision failed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>